• Part of
    Ubiquity Network logo

    Read Chapter
  • No readable formats available
  • Reflections on Police Reform

    Robert E. Worden, Sarah J. McLean

    Chapter from the book: Worden R. & McLean S. 2017. Mirage of Police Reform: Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy.

     Download

    This concluding chapter summarizes the principal findings of the research and the contributions to knowledge that the findings represent, and then it considers the implications of the findings for understanding procedural justice and police legitimacy, police efforts to promote police legitimacy, and future research on procedural justice. One implication is that it is imperative to draw a sharp distinction between procedural justice as citizens’ subjective experience and procedural justice as overt police behavior. A second implication is that police cannot do much to “create” legitimacy through the day-to-day interactions with citizens. Even organizational police reforms that have been weakly implemented and loosely coupled to the technical core of policing, such as community policing and tightened use of force policies, have probably done more than street-level procedural justice could to increase the legitimacy of the agencies that adopted them. The documented experience of the Cincinnati Police Department, which adopted a series of reforms pursuant to agreements with the Justice Department and a number of community stakeholder groups, illustrates what can be achieved with such reforms. A third implication is that in an institutionalized organization, what gets measured does not always get managed, as middle managers, supervisors, and the rank-and-file engage in sensemaking.

    Chapter Metrics:

    How to cite this chapter
    Worden R. & McLean S. 2017. Reflections on Police Reform. In: Worden R. & McLean S, Mirage of Police Reform. California: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.30.j
    License

    This chapter distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution + Noncommercial + NoDerivatives 4.0 license. Copyright is retained by the author(s)

    Peer Review Information

    This book has been peer reviewed. See our Peer Review Policies for more information.

    Additional Information

    Published on May 12, 2017

    DOI
    https://doi.org/10.1525/luminos.30.j


    comments powered by Disqus